K12 Libary Initiative A Project of the Washington State Library: A division of the Secretary of State
K12 Library Initiative




Evaluations

Evaluation of Library Initiative Training • 2005

A summary of events and evaluation will be posted after the completion of each training.

The University of Washington Information School did a K12 Library Initiative Research Study conducted by Dr. Betty Marcoux. For details of the results view this PowerPoint document.


One of the K-12 project goals is to train 1500 librarians over three summers. We trained 11% of our goal on June 29-30, August3-4, and August 18-19, 2005 at 10 regional sites.
180 people registered
163 people attended

59 of 186 school districts reporting library positions, were represented or 32%. The largest representation came from two districts: Kent with 14 people and Central Valley SD with 7 people.

Participants were asked to fill out two different evaluations.

The first one was a customized form for librarians taking Clock Hours. 72 evaluations were returned. The Report Summary divides the participants into six categories and three levels.

0

Classified Support

27

Elementary

53

Librarians

10

Middle and High

2

Paraeducator

02

K-12

5

Teacher Regular Ed

28

Undesignated

0

Facilitator

   

7

Undesignated

   

The second one was a general evaluation of the training asking nine questions. 136 evaluations were returned or 83%. 36 people made additional comments or 26%.

There appeared to be common themes throughout most of the evaluations.

1. Lots and lots of Kudos! ("They really like us!")
2. Trainers were appreciated especially for their enthusiasm and hard work. They were well prepared, encouraging, knowledgeable, positive, easy to relate to, peppy, helpful and practical.
3. Majority of those requesting clock hours felt the workshop was useful.
4. Would highly recommend to other librarians in their districts. Even principals should attend.
5. Many would like a follow-up (there will be a WLMA Session in October).
6. More time wanted for peer discussion and sharing of ideas.
7. Participants felt: energized, connected, part of the loop and grateful.
8. Workshop was: informative, relevant, useful, organized, plus gave direction and purpose to the library program.